In 2008 the Banks were required to come before the US Congress for a bailout of $700T...and that vote almost failed! The Fed has now tallied up a $3.3B bank bailout since 9/11/2019 and yet NOBODY SAYS A WORD! Heads THEY win...tails WE LOSE!!
Roota's "Year Zero" Recommendations
Liposomal Vitamin C
Chaga Mushroom Powder ...(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
Bank Bailouts Hit $3.3 Trillion...Did YOU Approve It?! In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the United States saw one of the largest bank bailouts in history. The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was implemented to rescue failing banks and stabilize the economy. However, the total cost of these bailouts has now reached a staggering $3.3 trillion, leaving many questioning the decision-making process behind it. Critics argue that the massive bailouts created a moral hazard, as banks that engaged in risky behavior were effectively rewarded for their actions. Instead of facing the consequences of their poor decisions, these institutions received taxpayer money to stay afloat. This raised concerns about accountability and the overall integrity of the financial system. One proponent of this viewpoint is Bix Weir, a prominent economist and author who has been vocal about his opposition to bank bailouts. Weir argues that the bailout money could have been better used to help struggling homeowners and consumers who were also impacted by the crisis. He believes that this could have led to a more equitable recovery that focused on Main Street rather than Wall Street. Weir also criticizes the lack of transparency surrounding the decision-making process for the bailout funds. Many argue that the allocation of funds was often done without proper oversight, leading to potential misuse or favoritism. Weir calls for greater accountability and public involvement in such critical financial decisions, pointing out that ultimately, it was the taxpayers who footed the bill. Another concern highlighted by Weir is the long-term impact of these bailouts on the economy. The injections of massive amounts of money into the banking system can have unintended consequences such as inflation and devaluation of the currency. These effects may not be immediately visible but can have long-term negative repercussions on the economy as a whole. However, it is important to note that proponents of the bank bailouts argue that they were necessary to prevent a complete collapse of the financial system. They maintain that the bailout funds helped stabilize the markets and prevent severe economic downturn. They argue that without the intervention, the consequences would have been far worse, affecting not only the banks but also the larger economy and individual citizens. Ultimately, the bank bailouts and their tremendous cost raise important questions about the role of government in times of financial crises. While some argue that government intervention is necessary to protect the economy, others question the ethics and fairness of bailing out private institutions with taxpayer money. The debate over bank bailouts is far from settled, and it serves as a reminder of the need for continued scrutiny and accountability in the financial sector. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the decisions made during the 2008 crisis, it is clear that the impact of these bailouts is deeply felt, both financially and politically. As we move forward, it is essential to learn from these lessons and work towards a more robust and equitable financial system that can withstand future shocks without asking taxpayers to shoulder such an immense burden. https://inflationprotection.org/bank-bailouts-reach-3-3-trillion-mark-were-you-in-support-by-bix-weir/?feed_id=141835&_unique_id=651ac871cc93e #Inflation #Retirement #GoldIRA #Wealth #Investing #bankbailout #bixweir #crypto #Gold #silver #BankFailures #bankbailout #bixweir #crypto #Gold #silver
Comments
Post a Comment