Skip to main content

Could Forced Reform and Constitutional Crisis Lead to Government Retirement? Taking Risks to Save the System


French President Emmanuel Macron ordered his prime minister to wield a special constitutional power on Thursday that skirts parliament to force through a highly unpopular bill raising the retirement age from 62 to 64 without a vote. His calculated risk set off a clamor among lawmakers, who began singing the national anthem even before Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne arrived in the lower chamber. She spoke forcefully over their shouts, acknowledging that Macron's unilateral move will trigger quick motions of no-confidence in his government. The fury of opposition lawmakers echoed the anger of citizens and workers' unions. Thousands gathered at the Place de la Concorde facing the National Assembly, lighting a bonfire. As night fell, police charged against the demonstrators in waves to clear the elegant Place, but hundreds remained nearly an hour later. For more on the ensuing 'constitutional crisis,' FRANCE 24 is joined by Eric Fassin, Professor of Sociology in the Department of Political Science, Department of Gender Studies and the Laboratory of Gender and Human Sexuality Studies (CNRS / University of Paris VIII / Paris-Ouest). 🔔 Subscribe to France 24 now: 🔴 LIVE - Watch FRANCE 24 English 24/7 here: 🌍 Read the latest International News and Top Stories: Like us on Facebook: Follow us on Twitter: Discover the news in pictures on Instagram: ...(read more)



LEARN MORE ABOUT: Retirement Pension Plans
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
In recent months, the term 'force majeure' has been frequently used by those advocating for radical reforms in different sectors of the society. This term refers to an unforeseeable event that is beyond human control, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a natural disaster, which may justify the imposition of drastic measures that go against the established norms. The use of force majeure to push for reforms, however, carries enormous risks, as it undermines the rule of law and democratic institutions. In the case of governments, it may lead to a constitutional crisis and the collapse of the legal system. The question remains, can the government survive a constitutional crisis borne out of force majeure? The recent events in India provide a glimpse of how this scenario could unfold. The Indian government, using the excuse of the COVID-19 pandemic, introduced several controversial reforms, including the abrogation of Article 370, a provision that granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This move was met with widespread protests and legal challenges, leading to a constitutional crisis that has yet to be resolved. Similarly, in Nigeria, the government has used force majeure to justify the suspension of Twitter, a move that has been widely criticized as a violation of human rights and an infringement on freedom of expression. This action has further raised tensions in a country already grappling with ethnic and religious divisions. At the heart of the matter is the question of whether force majeure should be a mechanism for circumventing the established legal process. While proponents argue that it allows for swift and decisive action during emergency situations, critics argue that it sets a dangerous precedent for autocratic rule by disregarding the rule of law. The risks associated with risking it all through force majeure are not limited to the immediate consequences of the actions taken. A constitutional crisis can have severe long-term consequences for a country, including a loss of confidence in the government and the legal system, economic instability, and political polarization. In conclusion, while force majeure may have its place in exceptional circumstances, it should not be used as a vehicle for radical social, economic, and political reforms. Instead, the government should rely on democratic processes that allow for meaningful dialogue and engagement with citizens to effect positive change. It is imperative that the government maintains its responsibility to respect the rule of law and the institutions that uphold it. Only through these key principles can stability and progress be achieved sustainably. https://inflationprotection.org/could-forced-reform-and-constitutional-crisis-lead-to-government-retirement-taking-risks-to-save-the-system/?feed_id=86353&_unique_id=6433d9b230e86 #Inflation #Retirement #GoldIRA #Wealth #Investing #ConstitutionalCrisis #ÉlisabethBorne #EmmanuelMacron #Europe #France #FRANCE24 #FRANCE24guest #Frenchpolitics #NationalAssembly #Parliament #pensionreform #protests #Reform #strikes #unions #RetirementPension #ConstitutionalCrisis #ÉlisabethBorne #EmmanuelMacron #Europe #France #FRANCE24 #FRANCE24guest #Frenchpolitics #NationalAssembly #Parliament #pensionreform #protests #Reform #strikes #unions

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Is Birch Gold Group a Reliable Choice for Your 2023 Gold IRA Investments?" - A Quick Review #shorts

In this Birch Gold Group review video, I go over what makes this Gold IRA company unique, the pros and cons, their fees, minimums, and much more. Get their free guide here: 👉 FREE Resources: ➜ Gold IRA Company Reviews: Birch Gold Group boasts high ratings from consumer advocate groups. With an A-plus rating from the Better Business Bureau, a triple-A rating from the Business Consumer Alliance, and high marks from Trust Link, Trustpilot, and Google Business, Birch Gold is a top choice to trust your hard-earned retirement savings. Birch Gold Group’s low initial investment minimum is another edge it has over its competitors whose minimums can range from $25,000 to $50,000. A beginning $10,000 minimum investment is all that is required to start a GOLD IRA with Birch which is advantageous for first-time investors. Spanning nearly two decades, Birch Gold Group’s mission and philosophy focus on a commitment to understanding your needs and finding the right fit for you. Their

Should I Rollover My 401k to an IRA? YES! #shorts #retirement #financialfreedom

Should I Rollover My 401k to an IRA? YES! #shorts #retirement #financialfreedom Should I Rollover My 401k to anIRA 🤔 || 401k to IRA Rollover Pro's & Con's In this video, I want to talk about rolling over your 401k to an IRA Rollover and if that makes sense for your retirement planning . I want to look at the pro's to rolling over a 401k and also the con's to rolling over a 401k. When you should rollover your 401k to an IRA and when you should NOT rollover your 401k to an IRA. Let's talk about when you should NOT rollover your 401k to an IRA: 1. You are still working and are under the age of 59.5 2. You are 55 and considering retirement (Rule 55) 3. Increased creditor protection in a 401k 4. 401k's offer loans--IRA's do not offer loans Why you SHOULD rollover your 401k to an IRA 1. More investment choices in IRA over 401k 2. Lower investment fees 3. Convert IRA to Roth IRA (Roth IRA Conversion) 4. Consolidation from multiple 401k'