Get the "Ultimate Guide to Bitcoin" course: Use the discount code YT99 to get the best price. In this video, I make the argument that Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) should NOT receive a government bailout. Depositors with less than $250,000 will be made whole by FDIC insurance. Taxpayer money should never be used to bail out bankers and VCs. Printing new money to bail out banks increases inflation for the working and middle classes, who are less likely to employ inflation hedges. If you are moved to help victims of bank collapses, feel free to do so using your own money, not taxpayers' money. Not investment advice! Consult a financial advisor. Silicon Valley Bank is shut down by regulators in biggest bank failure since global financial crisis: NetBank: Rust belt: Opioids and rural America: Sackler family and the cost of doing business: How FDA Failures Contributed to the Opioid Crisis: Billionaires need their bailouts: Bill Ackman uses CNBC to profit from his short: Nic Carter wants bailouts: But Nic Carter has funds stuck at SVB: David Sacks wants bailouts: David Sacks likes dumping his Solana on retail investors: How Warren Buffett Gained from Bank Bailout: I am not being paid or otherwise compensated by any company or cryptocurrency project that I mention in my videos. My opinion is not for sale. Please do not contact me with any affiliate or advertising deals. #svb #banks #bitcoin Disclaimer Neither Trader University, nor any of its directors, officers, shareholders, personnel, representatives, agents, or independent contractors (collectively, the “Operator Parties”) are licensed financial advisors, registered investment advisors, or registered broker-dealers. None of the Operator Parties are providing investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, and nothing in this video or at www.Trader.University (henceforth, “the Site”) should be construed as such by you. This video and the Site should be used as educational tools only and are not replacements for professional investment advice. There is a high risk in trading....(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
The global financial crisis of 2008 saw the collapse of several financial institutions, which prompted governments to step in and bail them out. The bailout was intended to prevent the collapse of the financial system and save millions of jobs. However, this action has been highly criticized by many, as it creates moral hazard and can lead to the poor management of financial institutions. It is why many experts are against bank bailouts ever again. The argument against bailouts is not new, and it is based on two main reasons. Firstly, a bailout encourages financial institutions to take unnecessary risks, knowing that they will be bailed out by the government in case of a crisis. This moral hazard can cause severe damage to the financial system and can lead to further economic crises. Secondly, bank bailouts are a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to financial institutions. The use of taxpayer's money to bail out banks does not only rob the taxpayers of their hard-earned money, but it also creates injustices in the economy, as the benefits go disproportionately to the wealthy. The argument for bailouts, on the other hand, suggests that the failure of a significant financial institution could lead to the collapse of the entire financial system, resulting in severe economic shock. Proponents of bailouts argue that they can avoid this risk by providing necessary capital injections to ensure that the financial institution does not fail, thus preventing the entire economy from crashing. However, this argument lacks merit, as it does not consider the long-term implications of such actions. Rather than propping up failing financial institutions, it would be better to allow them to fail, as this would encourage organizations to operate efficiently and prevent them from engaging in reckless behavior in the future. Furthermore, the use of taxpayer funds to bail out these institutions is not fair. The banks that benefit from bailouts are often the same ones that caused the financial crisis in the first place, making it hard to justify using public funds to help them out. Instead of bailing out failing banks, regulators should focus on appropriate regulations to prevent another crisis from happening. In conclusion, bank bailouts should never be an option. They encourage financial institutions to engage in reckless behavior, are funded by taxpayers, and disproportionately benefit the wealthy. Instead of relying on bailouts, we should look for ways to prevent financial crises from happening, like enforcing proper regulations, and allow failures to occur to eliminate moral hazard in the financial system. https://inflationprotection.org/permanently-no-bailouts-for-banks/?feed_id=87340&_unique_id=6437e703d9c80 #Inflation #Retirement #GoldIRA #Wealth #Investing #bankbailouts #Bitcoin #siliconvalleybank #svb #TraderUniversity #BankFailures #bankbailouts #Bitcoin #siliconvalleybank #svb #TraderUniversity
Comments
Post a Comment